國立虎尾科技大學 |

Indian Fields : = Historicizing Native Space and Sovereignty in the Era of Removal.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Indian Fields :/
其他題名:	Historicizing Native Space and Sovereignty in the Era of Removal.
作者:	Cooke, Jason Scott.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (335 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
標題:	American literature. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355076288

Indian Fields : = Historicizing Native Space and Sovereignty in the Era of Removal.
Cooke, Jason Scott.

Indian Fields :Historicizing Native Space and Sovereignty in the Era of Removal. - 1 online resource (335 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Familiar to most anyone with knowledge of U.S. history, antebellum Indian removal likely evokes a drama comprised of two roles: on one hand, Indian peoples as represented by elite Cherokee activists, and, on the other, their political antagonists in the nascent states' rights movement, among whom the infamous Andrew Jackson stands both as agent and symbol. What may be surprising, however, is that Americanist scholarship on Native removal similarly reduces it to an overarching Indian-Anglo binary. As against a two-worlds model that frames removal writ large in terms of a single political dualism, I argue that regionally specific forms of Native dispossession around the time of the Indian Removal Act (1830) yield different narrative assemblages of Indian identity. Further, these assemblages correspond with differences in the historical conditions of settler colonialism in different parts of the country, conditions irreducible to a single narrative premised on the territorial claims of the United States. Combining work in the field of Native studies by scholars such as Gerald Vizenor and Jodi Byrd with post-structuralist insights into the relationship between narrativity and historicism, this dissertation develops a geographic paradigm that emphasizes the ways in which both Native and settler actors use linear narratives of history to fashion claims to territory. Each chapter situates the work of an Indigenous activist of the period (the Cherokee spokesperson Elias Boudinot, the Pequot minister William Apess, and the Sauk warrior Black Hawk) in relation to non-Native political and literary texts that lay claim, whether implicitly or explicitly, to lands otherwise held by these activists' respective nations. Accordingly, the project argues for a change in the conceptualization of Indian identity. Rather than a vexed yet essentially referential signifier for Native peoples, Indianness as a narrative construct marks the point at which uneven and at times competing territorial claims by different settler actors gives way to a portrait of the historical necessity of a given claim. What is more, this narrativity becomes available to Native peoples themselves as these regional struggles unfold. Insofar as it renders a linear historicity in the service of land claims, narrating Indianness gives Native activists a means to represent place-based Indigenous sovereignty to audiences not inclined to make sense of this concept.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355076288Subjects--Topical Terms:

685398
American literature.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Indian Fields : = Historicizing Native Space and Sovereignty in the Era of Removal.
LDR:03638ntm a2200325K 4500 001 915126
005 20180727091510.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355076288
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10264620
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uncg:12210
035 $a AAI10264620
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cooke, Jason Scott. $3 1188378
245 1 0 $a Indian Fields : $b Historicizing Native Space and Sovereignty in the Era of Removal.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (335 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Mark Rifkin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Familiar to most anyone with knowledge of U.S. history, antebellum Indian removal likely evokes a drama comprised of two roles: on one hand, Indian peoples as represented by elite Cherokee activists, and, on the other, their political antagonists in the nascent states' rights movement, among whom the infamous Andrew Jackson stands both as agent and symbol. What may be surprising, however, is that Americanist scholarship on Native removal similarly reduces it to an overarching Indian-Anglo binary. As against a two-worlds model that frames removal writ large in terms of a single political dualism, I argue that regionally specific forms of Native dispossession around the time of the Indian Removal Act (1830) yield different narrative assemblages of Indian identity. Further, these assemblages correspond with differences in the historical conditions of settler colonialism in different parts of the country, conditions irreducible to a single narrative premised on the territorial claims of the United States. Combining work in the field of Native studies by scholars such as Gerald Vizenor and Jodi Byrd with post-structuralist insights into the relationship between narrativity and historicism, this dissertation develops a geographic paradigm that emphasizes the ways in which both Native and settler actors use linear narratives of history to fashion claims to territory. Each chapter situates the work of an Indigenous activist of the period (the Cherokee spokesperson Elias Boudinot, the Pequot minister William Apess, and the Sauk warrior Black Hawk) in relation to non-Native political and literary texts that lay claim, whether implicitly or explicitly, to lands otherwise held by these activists' respective nations. Accordingly, the project argues for a change in the conceptualization of Indian identity. Rather than a vexed yet essentially referential signifier for Native peoples, Indianness as a narrative construct marks the point at which uneven and at times competing territorial claims by different settler actors gives way to a portrait of the historical necessity of a given claim. What is more, this narrativity becomes available to Native peoples themselves as these regional struggles unfold. Insofar as it renders a linear historicity in the service of land claims, narrating Indianness gives Native activists a means to represent place-based Indigenous sovereignty to audiences not inclined to make sense of this concept.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a American literature. $3 685398
650 4 $a Native American studies. $3 1179522
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0591
690 $a 0740
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. $b English. $3 1184725
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264620 $z click for full text (PQDT)