國立虎尾科技大學 |

Leadership and emotional intelligence : = Ability-based and mixed models of emotional intelligence as predictors of leadership performance across manager levels.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Leadership and emotional intelligence :/
Reminder of title:	Ability-based and mixed models of emotional intelligence as predictors of leadership performance across manager levels.
Author:	Carroll, William E.
Description:	1 online resource (133 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
Subject:	Business administration. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369685732

Leadership and emotional intelligence : = Ability-based and mixed models of emotional intelligence as predictors of leadership performance across manager levels.
Carroll, William E.

Leadership and emotional intelligence :Ability-based and mixed models of emotional intelligence as predictors of leadership performance across manager levels. - 1 online resource (133 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Capella University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

The current study asks four primary research questions to address several questions about the psychometric properties of emotional intelligence (EI) assessments; is there a statistically significant difference in (a) the predictive validity of a participant's EI scores for their leadership performance as measured by Charismatic/Transformational Leadership (CTL) behavior occurrence when EI is measured using an assessment based on the ability-based as compared to an assessment based on the mixed model; (b) the predictive validity of a participant's EI scores for their leadership performance as measured by CTL behavior occurrence when EI is measured at different levels of leadership within the organizational hierarchy; (c) the predictive validity of a participant's EI scores when measured using an assessment based on the abilities-based model for their leadership performance as measured by CTL behavior occurrence when EI is measured at different levels of leadership within the organizational hierarchy and; (d) the predictive validity of a participant's EI scores when measured using an assessment based on the mixed model for their leadership performance as measured by CTL behavior occurrence when EI is measured at different levels of leadership within the organizational hierarchy? The goals were to determine (a) if there is a difference in how well the ability-based and mixed models each predict the self-reported CTL and (b) if this predictive relationship is affected by a leader's position within the organizational hierarchy. Current supervisors from all levels within their organization's hierarchies completed the MSCEIT, Genos EI, MLQ, and a demographic questionnaire which asked for their leadership level. 168 current leader's data was obtained from Qualtrics, LLC. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the predictive validities of the abilities-based and mixed models of EI for self-reported CTL. Regression-based tests for moderation effects showed a statistically significant difference in the regression coefficients between front-line leaders and other leadership levels for the MSCEIT, but no statistically significant differences for the Genos-EI. Possible artifacts and confounding variables were discussed, with particular focus on the use of self-report versions of the assessments.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369685732Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148568
Business administration.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Leadership and emotional intelligence : = Ability-based and mixed models of emotional intelligence as predictors of leadership performance across manager levels.
LDR:03599ntm a2200313K 4500 001 915462
005 20180803131930.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369685732
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10264376
035 $a (MiAaPQ)capella:19479
035 $a AAI10264376
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Carroll, William E. $3 1188820
245 1 0 $a Leadership and emotional intelligence : $b Ability-based and mixed models of emotional intelligence as predictors of leadership performance across manager levels.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (133 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-08(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Elizabeth Koman.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Capella University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The current study asks four primary research questions to address several questions about the psychometric properties of emotional intelligence (EI) assessments; is there a statistically significant difference in (a) the predictive validity of a participant's EI scores for their leadership performance as measured by Charismatic/Transformational Leadership (CTL) behavior occurrence when EI is measured using an assessment based on the ability-based as compared to an assessment based on the mixed model; (b) the predictive validity of a participant's EI scores for their leadership performance as measured by CTL behavior occurrence when EI is measured at different levels of leadership within the organizational hierarchy; (c) the predictive validity of a participant's EI scores when measured using an assessment based on the abilities-based model for their leadership performance as measured by CTL behavior occurrence when EI is measured at different levels of leadership within the organizational hierarchy and; (d) the predictive validity of a participant's EI scores when measured using an assessment based on the mixed model for their leadership performance as measured by CTL behavior occurrence when EI is measured at different levels of leadership within the organizational hierarchy? The goals were to determine (a) if there is a difference in how well the ability-based and mixed models each predict the self-reported CTL and (b) if this predictive relationship is affected by a leader's position within the organizational hierarchy. Current supervisors from all levels within their organization's hierarchies completed the MSCEIT, Genos EI, MLQ, and a demographic questionnaire which asked for their leadership level. 168 current leader's data was obtained from Qualtrics, LLC. Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the predictive validities of the abilities-based and mixed models of EI for self-reported CTL. Regression-based tests for moderation effects showed a statistically significant difference in the regression coefficients between front-line leaders and other leadership levels for the MSCEIT, but no statistically significant differences for the Genos-EI. Possible artifacts and confounding variables were discussed, with particular focus on the use of self-report versions of the assessments.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 1148568
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0310
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Capella University. $b Social and Behavioral Sciences. $3 1179663
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10264376 $z click for full text (PQDT)