國立虎尾科技大學 |

Comparing Two Alternate Assessments : = Dynamic Learning Maps and Multi-State Alternate Assessment.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparing Two Alternate Assessments :/
其他題名:	Dynamic Learning Maps and Multi-State Alternate Assessment.
作者:	Sir, Dana N.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (87 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355505986

Comparing Two Alternate Assessments : = Dynamic Learning Maps and Multi-State Alternate Assessment.
Sir, Dana N.

Comparing Two Alternate Assessments :Dynamic Learning Maps and Multi-State Alternate Assessment. - 1 online resource (87 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Seton Hall University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

In 2001 under No Child Left Behind, states were required to create an alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities using alternate achievement standards. In 2003, all states had created an alternate assessment. All fifty states independently developed, implemented, and revised their alternate assessments. By 2014, Dynamic Learning Map (DLM) and Multi-State Alternate Assessment (MSAA) (formerly National Center and State Collaborative)----two alternate assessments developed through consortiums consisting of state departments, universities, and organizations using federal funding----were created. At the time of this study, the DLM and MSAA were used by approximately 49% of states for their alternate assessment. This study compared the DLM and MSAA in English language arts for students with significant cognitive disabilities in grades three through eight. The study focused on the DLM's and MSAA's measurement criterion and how they affect informational outcomes as well as how the alternate assessments are administered. The findings illustrated that the DLM and MSAA are primarily administered online to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Accessibility supports available through both alternate assessments are comparable. The DLM and MSAA may be administered on various devices, increasing their ability to individualize and accommodate to a student needs. Although there were differences in how the assessments were differentiated, the informational outcomes produced by both alternate assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities were similar and, therefore, one alternate assessment could not be identified as superior to the other.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355505986Subjects--Topical Terms:

567627
Special education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Comparing Two Alternate Assessments : = Dynamic Learning Maps and Multi-State Alternate Assessment.
LDR:02887ntm a2200325K 4500 001 915686
005 20180821113841.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355505986
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10685721
035 $a (MiAaPQ)shu:10300
035 $a AAI10685721
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sir, Dana N. $3 1189142
245 1 0 $a Comparing Two Alternate Assessments : $b Dynamic Learning Maps and Multi-State Alternate Assessment.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (87 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Luke J. Stedrak.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Seton Hall University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In 2001 under No Child Left Behind, states were required to create an alternate assessment for students with significant cognitive disabilities using alternate achievement standards. In 2003, all states had created an alternate assessment. All fifty states independently developed, implemented, and revised their alternate assessments. By 2014, Dynamic Learning Map (DLM) and Multi-State Alternate Assessment (MSAA) (formerly National Center and State Collaborative)----two alternate assessments developed through consortiums consisting of state departments, universities, and organizations using federal funding----were created. At the time of this study, the DLM and MSAA were used by approximately 49% of states for their alternate assessment. This study compared the DLM and MSAA in English language arts for students with significant cognitive disabilities in grades three through eight. The study focused on the DLM's and MSAA's measurement criterion and how they affect informational outcomes as well as how the alternate assessments are administered. The findings illustrated that the DLM and MSAA are primarily administered online to students with significant cognitive disabilities. Accessibility supports available through both alternate assessments are comparable. The DLM and MSAA may be administered on various devices, increasing their ability to individualize and accommodate to a student needs. Although there were differences in how the assessments were differentiated, the informational outcomes produced by both alternate assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities were similar and, therefore, one alternate assessment could not be identified as superior to the other.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Special education. $3 567627
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 1180442
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Seton Hall University. $b Education Leadership, Management and Policy. $3 1186378
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10685721 $z click for full text (PQDT)