國立虎尾科技大學 |

Norms of authorship in ancient Greece: = Case studies of Herodotus, Isocrates, and Plato.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Norms of authorship in ancient Greece: /
其他題名:	Case studies of Herodotus, Isocrates, and Plato.
作者:	Behme, Timothy Donald.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (162 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-07, Section: A, page: 2926.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International68-07A.
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780549113416

Norms of authorship in ancient Greece: = Case studies of Herodotus, Isocrates, and Plato.
Behme, Timothy Donald.

Norms of authorship in ancient Greece: Case studies of Herodotus, Isocrates, and Plato. - 1 online resource (162 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-07, Section: A, page: 2926.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2007.

Includes bibliographical references

The following question guides this study: Why and to what extent and in what contexts did authorship issues matter during the fifth and fourth centuries BCE in ancient Greece? I examined all writings attributed to Herodotus, Isocrates, and Plato; I arbitrated among competing English translations of relevant passages and proposed emendations in others; and I consulted secondary sources. I argue that Herodotus' Histories abounds with authorship issues. Herodotus stipulates for himself an ethical obligation to cite source material, and he makes many allegations of unethical authorial attribution, which encompass verbal and written discourse as well as prose and poetry. I conclude that Herodotus stipulated his own ethical obligation in such a way as to cite himself repeatedly as the ultimate source of the Histories. Isocrates' texts repeatedly describe discursive originality as a virtue and discursive unoriginality as a vice; moreover, Isocrates indicates that audiences expected originality from orators. I argue that for Isocrates originality consists of seizing the opportunity to say something new and better about something significant. I conclude that Isocrates' own obsession with originality coincided with his desires for fame, fortune, and secular immortality. Plato's texts indicate his awareness that authorial attribution was considered an issue and that producing discourse could garner fame and an everlasting name. I argue that Plato challenges this state of affairs in several ways: Socrates emphasizes the importance of what was said instead of who said it, and he repeatedly professes his own lack of originality. Additionally, for Plato knowledge comes about not by learning something new but by recollecting what the soul once knew, so the authorship issues in Herodotus' and Isocrates' texts are irrelevant in Platonic texts. While acknowledging the limitations of a case-study approach, I argue that these texts refute statements asserting that concerns about authorship issues began during the Enlightenment, the Reformation, or the Romantic Period. Conversely, I do not argue that my analyses establish the real beginnings of such concerns. Rather, I provide an example of historical research about authorship issues that does away with a quest for their origins entirely.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780549113416Subjects--Topical Terms:

567738
Rhetoric.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Norms of authorship in ancient Greece: = Case studies of Herodotus, Isocrates, and Plato.
LDR:03519ntm a2200325Ki 4500 001 915937
005 20180907134543.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2007 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780549113416
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3273111
035 $a AAI3273111
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Behme, Timothy Donald. $3 1189491
245 1 0 $a Norms of authorship in ancient Greece: $b Case studies of Herodotus, Isocrates, and Plato.
264 0 $c 2007
300 $a 1 online resource (162 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 68-07, Section: A, page: 2926.
500 $a Adviser: Edward Schiappa.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2007.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The following question guides this study: Why and to what extent and in what contexts did authorship issues matter during the fifth and fourth centuries BCE in ancient Greece? I examined all writings attributed to Herodotus, Isocrates, and Plato; I arbitrated among competing English translations of relevant passages and proposed emendations in others; and I consulted secondary sources. I argue that Herodotus' Histories abounds with authorship issues. Herodotus stipulates for himself an ethical obligation to cite source material, and he makes many allegations of unethical authorial attribution, which encompass verbal and written discourse as well as prose and poetry. I conclude that Herodotus stipulated his own ethical obligation in such a way as to cite himself repeatedly as the ultimate source of the Histories. Isocrates' texts repeatedly describe discursive originality as a virtue and discursive unoriginality as a vice; moreover, Isocrates indicates that audiences expected originality from orators. I argue that for Isocrates originality consists of seizing the opportunity to say something new and better about something significant. I conclude that Isocrates' own obsession with originality coincided with his desires for fame, fortune, and secular immortality. Plato's texts indicate his awareness that authorial attribution was considered an issue and that producing discourse could garner fame and an everlasting name. I argue that Plato challenges this state of affairs in several ways: Socrates emphasizes the importance of what was said instead of who said it, and he repeatedly professes his own lack of originality. Additionally, for Plato knowledge comes about not by learning something new but by recollecting what the soul once knew, so the authorship issues in Herodotus' and Isocrates' texts are irrelevant in Platonic texts. While acknowledging the limitations of a case-study approach, I argue that these texts refute statements asserting that concerns about authorship issues began during the Enlightenment, the Reformation, or the Romantic Period. Conversely, I do not argue that my analyses establish the real beginnings of such concerns. Rather, I provide an example of historical research about authorship issues that does away with a quest for their origins entirely.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 567738
650 4 $a Classical literature. $3 654014
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0294
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Minnesota. $3 1184161
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 68-07A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3273111 $z click for full text (PQDT)