國立虎尾科技大學 |

The 'Next Generation' of Constructivist Reform in Science and STEM : = Case Study Explorations of the Practices of Students and the Perspectives of Teachers.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The 'Next Generation' of Constructivist Reform in Science and STEM :/
其他題名:	Case Study Explorations of the Practices of Students and the Perspectives of Teachers.
作者:	Green, Amy E.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (218 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-07A(E).
標題:	Science education. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355629309

The 'Next Generation' of Constructivist Reform in Science and STEM : = Case Study Explorations of the Practices of Students and the Perspectives of Teachers.
Green, Amy E.

The 'Next Generation' of Constructivist Reform in Science and STEM :Case Study Explorations of the Practices of Students and the Perspectives of Teachers. - 1 online resource (218 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation provides insights into the potential for the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and a complementary instructional model, transdisciplinary STEM, to advance constructivist approaches to high-quality education by providing a framework and pedagogical model that authentically communicate these principles for practitioners. Through two research projects, I explore some of the dilemmas facing educators implementing these reform initiatives. First, I present a study of the relationship between discursive epistemic agency and scientific authenticity in school. I argue that epistemological misalignment between perspectives underpinning traditional approaches to school science and those of professional science contribute to tensions regarding the amount of control that students should be given over the discourse of science. Using NGSS as representative of authenticity, I explore and respond to a dilemma faced by many science educators of whether students must relinquish discursive agency for their participation in science to be considered authentic. Analyses of contrasting types of 'talk' in a first-grade classroom support the theoretical argument that increased discursive agency directly contributes to engagement in authentic science practices (as defined by NGSS). The second report represents a case study analysis of the perspectives of participants in a degree program focused on interdisciplinary approaches to learning. I ask, how do teachers' epistemological beliefs affect their perceptions of the locus of perceived barriers and the extent to which those barriers may be overcome? My results indicate that accessing teacher beliefs is productive for understanding the relative alignment between their personal epistemologies and those of the reform. Furthermore, epistemological beliefs may be intimately entangled with, rather than function discretely from, these teachers' perceptions of constraints to implementation of reform. The conclusions of these two research projects indicate that epistemological perspectives pervade the discourse of science, the text of curricular resources, and the language teachers use to talk about the implementation of pedagogical models. Furthermore, authentic enactments of science and meaningful learning are at least partially dependent upon a consistent alignment between the epistemologies underpinning reform efforts, those reflected in the language of school, and the personal epistemologies of educators.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355629309Subjects--Topical Terms:

1151737
Science education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The 'Next Generation' of Constructivist Reform in Science and STEM : = Case Study Explorations of the Practices of Students and the Perspectives of Teachers.
LDR:03812ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 916354
005 20181002081324.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355629309
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10641851
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umd:18623
035 $a AAI10641851
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Green, Amy E. $3 1190054
245 1 4 $a The 'Next Generation' of Constructivist Reform in Science and STEM : $b Case Study Explorations of the Practices of Students and the Perspectives of Teachers.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (218 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Andrew Elby.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, College Park, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation provides insights into the potential for the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and a complementary instructional model, transdisciplinary STEM, to advance constructivist approaches to high-quality education by providing a framework and pedagogical model that authentically communicate these principles for practitioners. Through two research projects, I explore some of the dilemmas facing educators implementing these reform initiatives. First, I present a study of the relationship between discursive epistemic agency and scientific authenticity in school. I argue that epistemological misalignment between perspectives underpinning traditional approaches to school science and those of professional science contribute to tensions regarding the amount of control that students should be given over the discourse of science. Using NGSS as representative of authenticity, I explore and respond to a dilemma faced by many science educators of whether students must relinquish discursive agency for their participation in science to be considered authentic. Analyses of contrasting types of 'talk' in a first-grade classroom support the theoretical argument that increased discursive agency directly contributes to engagement in authentic science practices (as defined by NGSS). The second report represents a case study analysis of the perspectives of participants in a degree program focused on interdisciplinary approaches to learning. I ask, how do teachers' epistemological beliefs affect their perceptions of the locus of perceived barriers and the extent to which those barriers may be overcome? My results indicate that accessing teacher beliefs is productive for understanding the relative alignment between their personal epistemologies and those of the reform. Furthermore, epistemological beliefs may be intimately entangled with, rather than function discretely from, these teachers' perceptions of constraints to implementation of reform. The conclusions of these two research projects indicate that epistemological perspectives pervade the discourse of science, the text of curricular resources, and the language teachers use to talk about the implementation of pedagogical models. Furthermore, authentic enactments of science and meaningful learning are at least partially dependent upon a consistent alignment between the epistemologies underpinning reform efforts, those reflected in the language of school, and the personal epistemologies of educators.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Science education. $3 1151737
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 1148451
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0530
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Maryland, College Park. $b Curriculum and Instruction. $3 1182033
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-07A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10641851 $z click for full text (PQDT)