國立虎尾科技大學 |

"Who Breaked the Rule?" : = Rethinking English Past Tense Overregularizations.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	"Who Breaked the Rule?" :/
其他題名:	Rethinking English Past Tense Overregularizations.
作者:	Figueroa, Megan.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (108 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355943986

"Who Breaked the Rule?" : = Rethinking English Past Tense Overregularizations.
Figueroa, Megan.

"Who Breaked the Rule?" :Rethinking English Past Tense Overregularizations. - 1 online resource (108 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

To learn a language, children must go beyond simply imitating speech and learn the rules of the language from their surrounding linguistic environment. One way to tell that children learn rules is that they apply rules to an overly broad set of words. For example, English-learning children produce forms like 'breaked' or 'catched' at around 3 years of age. These forms, called past tense overregularizations, show that children have implicitly discovered the past tense formation rule: namely, "add '--ed' to a verb to create the past tense." But does it take children until age 3 to discover such rules?

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355943986Subjects--Topical Terms:

557829
Linguistics.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

"Who Breaked the Rule?" : = Rethinking English Past Tense Overregularizations.
LDR:03035ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 917741
005 20181022132218.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355943986
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10793972
035 $a (MiAaPQ)arizona:16197
035 $a AAI10793972
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Figueroa, Megan. $3 1191893
245 1 0 $a "Who Breaked the Rule?" : $b Rethinking English Past Tense Overregularizations.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (108 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: LouAnn Gerken.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a To learn a language, children must go beyond simply imitating speech and learn the rules of the language from their surrounding linguistic environment. One way to tell that children learn rules is that they apply rules to an overly broad set of words. For example, English-learning children produce forms like 'breaked' or 'catched' at around 3 years of age. These forms, called past tense overregularizations, show that children have implicitly discovered the past tense formation rule: namely, "add '--ed' to a verb to create the past tense." But does it take children until age 3 to discover such rules?
520 $a This dissertation combines a behavioral study with 16-month-olds and a corpus analysis of longitudinal, spontaneous child speech to achieve two goals: the first is to seek evidence that the past tense rule can be found in 16-month-olds, which would be consistent with many observations that children display significant receptive abilities long before their productive abilities reach the same level. The second goal is to determine if the production of past tense overregularizations can be explained by factors other than the discovery of a grammatical rule.
520 $a Results indicate that children have enough experience with English by 16 months of age to represent verb + '--ed' months before they begin to overregularize in production; therefore, production does not seem to reflect when the past tense rule actually comes online. 16-month-olds were able to discriminate between overregularized verbs and 1) their correct counterparts, 2) nonce verbs + '--ed', and 3) English noun stems marked with '--ed'. Further, overregularizations in production seem to reflect children's need to simplify their utterances as they attempt to say more and more complex sentences.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
650 4 $a Developmental psychology. $3 557458
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0620
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Linguistics. $3 1183978
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10793972 $z click for full text (PQDT)