語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Joint-Employer Classification : = NL...
~
State University of New York Empire State College.
Joint-Employer Classification : = NLRB Polarization in the Administration of Contingent Employee Labor Rights.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Joint-Employer Classification :/
其他題名:
NLRB Polarization in the Administration of Contingent Employee Labor Rights.
作者:
Moran, Marcus.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (108 pages)
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International56-06(E).
標題:
Labor relations. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355170818
Joint-Employer Classification : = NLRB Polarization in the Administration of Contingent Employee Labor Rights.
Moran, Marcus.
Joint-Employer Classification :
NLRB Polarization in the Administration of Contingent Employee Labor Rights. - 1 online resource (108 pages)
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
Thesis (M.A.)--State University of New York Empire State College, 2017.
Includes bibliographical references
The National Labor Relations Act sets forth limited definitions of what it means to be an employer and an employee in the twentieth-century industrial economy, and bestows on the National Labor Relations Board the authority to classify employees and employers. The past half-century has witnessed the growth of triangular staffing arrangements such as franchises, independent contractors, temporary help services firms, and a service sector in which many contingent workers may not qualify as employees, leaving them unprotected by the Act. By examining Board decisions addressing joint-employer and independent contractor status since 1960, this paper has identified increased polarization---the tendency of Democratic and Republican Board members to vote in opposing, and often politicized directions---in Board decisions classifying employers and employees. The findings suggest that in determining worker eligibility for protection under the Act, the Board is more polarized than at any point in 50 years.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355170818Subjects--Topical Terms:
1179301
Labor relations.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Joint-Employer Classification : = NLRB Polarization in the Administration of Contingent Employee Labor Rights.
LDR
:02305ntm a2200349Ki 4500
001
918014
005
20181022132813.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355170818
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10607958
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)esc:10517
035
$a
AAI10607958
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Moran, Marcus.
$3
1192235
245
1 0
$a
Joint-Employer Classification :
$b
NLRB Polarization in the Administration of Contingent Employee Labor Rights.
264
0
$c
2017
300
$a
1 online resource (108 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
500
$a
Advisers: Jason Russell; Margaret Tally.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--State University of New York Empire State College, 2017.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
The National Labor Relations Act sets forth limited definitions of what it means to be an employer and an employee in the twentieth-century industrial economy, and bestows on the National Labor Relations Board the authority to classify employees and employers. The past half-century has witnessed the growth of triangular staffing arrangements such as franchises, independent contractors, temporary help services firms, and a service sector in which many contingent workers may not qualify as employees, leaving them unprotected by the Act. By examining Board decisions addressing joint-employer and independent contractor status since 1960, this paper has identified increased polarization---the tendency of Democratic and Republican Board members to vote in opposing, and often politicized directions---in Board decisions classifying employers and employees. The findings suggest that in determining worker eligibility for protection under the Act, the Board is more polarized than at any point in 50 years.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Labor relations.
$3
1179301
650
4
$a
Law.
$3
671705
650
4
$a
Public policy.
$3
1002398
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0629
690
$a
0398
690
$a
0630
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
State University of New York Empire State College.
$b
Labor and Policy Studies.
$3
1183166
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
56-06(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10607958
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入