國立虎尾科技大學 |

Who's Blogging Now? : = Linguistic Features and Authorship Analysis in Sports Blogs.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Who's Blogging Now? :/
Reminder of title:	Linguistic Features and Authorship Analysis in Sports Blogs.
Author:	Cox, Taylor.
Description:	1 online resource (172 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-03A(E).
Subject:	Linguistics. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355505689

Who's Blogging Now? : = Linguistic Features and Authorship Analysis in Sports Blogs.
Cox, Taylor.

Who's Blogging Now? :Linguistic Features and Authorship Analysis in Sports Blogs. - 1 online resource (172 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

The field of authorship determination, previously largely falling under the umbrella of literary analysis but recently becoming a large subfield of forensic linguistics, has grown substantially over the last two decades. As its body of research and its record of successful forensic application continue to grow, this growth is paralleled by the demand for its application. However, methods which have undergone rigorous testing to show their reliability and replicability, allowing them to meet the strict Daubert criteria put forth by the US court system, have not truly been established.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355505689Subjects--Topical Terms:

557829
Linguistics.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Who's Blogging Now? : = Linguistic Features and Authorship Analysis in Sports Blogs.
LDR:03163ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 918043
005 20181022132814.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355505689
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10643090
035 $a (MiAaPQ)asu:17470
035 $a AAI10643090
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Cox, Taylor. $3 1192267
245 1 0 $a Who's Blogging Now? : $b Linguistic Features and Authorship Analysis in Sports Blogs.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (172 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Elly Van Gelderen.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The field of authorship determination, previously largely falling under the umbrella of literary analysis but recently becoming a large subfield of forensic linguistics, has grown substantially over the last two decades. As its body of research and its record of successful forensic application continue to grow, this growth is paralleled by the demand for its application. However, methods which have undergone rigorous testing to show their reliability and replicability, allowing them to meet the strict Daubert criteria put forth by the US court system, have not truly been established.
520 $a In this study, I set out to investigate how a list of parameters, many commonly used in the methodologies of previous researchers, would perform when used to test documents of bloggers from a sports blog, Winging It in Motown. Three prolific bloggers were chosen from the site, and a corpus of posts was created for each blogger which was then examined for each of the chosen parameters. One test document for each of the three bloggers which was not included in that blogger's corpus was then chosen from the blog page, and these documents were examined for each of the parameters via the same methodologies as were used to examine the corpora. Once data for the corpora and all three test documents was obtained, the results were compared for similarity, and an author determination was made for each test document along each parameter.
520 $a The findings indicated that overall the parameters were quite unsuccessful in determining authorship for these test documents based on the author corpora developed for the study. Only two parameters successfully identified the authors of the test documents at a rate higher than chance, and the possibility exists that other factors may be driving these successful identifications, demanding further research to confirm their validity as parameters for the purpose of authorship work.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b English. $3 1183907
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-03A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10643090 $z click for full text (PQDT)