語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Aviation English is Distinct from Co...
~
University of Oregon.
Aviation English is Distinct from Conversational English : = Evidence from Prosodic Analyses and Listening Performance.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Aviation English is Distinct from Conversational English :/
其他題名:
Evidence from Prosodic Analyses and Listening Performance.
作者:
Trippe, Julia E.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (213 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:
Linguistics. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355859058
Aviation English is Distinct from Conversational English : = Evidence from Prosodic Analyses and Listening Performance.
Trippe, Julia E.
Aviation English is Distinct from Conversational English :
Evidence from Prosodic Analyses and Listening Performance. - 1 online resource (213 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2018.
Includes bibliographical references
International aviation professionals converse in a register of English derived from postwar radiotelephony. Decades of use and regulatory pressure established Aviation English (AE) as the lingua franca for pilots and air traffic controllers. Recently, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) required aviation professionals prove AE proficiency, resulting in development of a variety of AE programs and tests derived from English language pedagogy, without accounting for unique aviation language requirements. This dissertation explores linguistic characteristics that must be accounted for in international AE programs.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355859058Subjects--Topical Terms:
557829
Linguistics.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Aviation English is Distinct from Conversational English : = Evidence from Prosodic Analyses and Listening Performance.
LDR
:03745ntm a2200373Ki 4500
001
918081
005
20181022132814.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355859058
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10751612
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)oregon:12115
035
$a
AAI10751612
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Trippe, Julia E.
$3
1192311
245
1 0
$a
Aviation English is Distinct from Conversational English :
$b
Evidence from Prosodic Analyses and Listening Performance.
264
0
$c
2018
300
$a
1 online resource (213 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Eric Pederson.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2018.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
International aviation professionals converse in a register of English derived from postwar radiotelephony. Decades of use and regulatory pressure established Aviation English (AE) as the lingua franca for pilots and air traffic controllers. Recently, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) required aviation professionals prove AE proficiency, resulting in development of a variety of AE programs and tests derived from English language pedagogy, without accounting for unique aviation language requirements. This dissertation explores linguistic characteristics that must be accounted for in international AE programs.
520
$a
Historically, issues of English language dominance were sidestepped by letting speakers of regional languages use their own aviation jargon, allowing native English speakers (NESs) to claim AE proficiency without learning a language comprehensible to international AE users. By allowing limited "plain language" use, this practice paved the way for colloquial jargon that is often opaque to non-native English speakers (NNESs). This led to an ICAO requirement that international pilots and controllers have conversational English (CE) proficiency.
520
$a
A phonological examination of AE must begin by defining a baseline in comparison with other language forms. Regarding AE, it is critical to determine if there are differences with CE, because of the assumption of compatibility inherent in ICAO proficiency requirements. This dissertation compared AE with CE by examining the prosody and intelligibility of each language variety.
520
$a
Prosodic differences in AE and CE were examined in two radio corpora: air traffic controllers and radio newscasters. From these data I examined rhythm, intonation and speech rate differences that could affect intelligibility across registers. Using laboratory studies of pilot and non-pilot NESs and NNESs, I examined AE intelligibility differences based on language background. NNES pilots scored worse on CE tasks and better on AE tasks than NES non-pilots, indicating CE proficiency is not a predictor of AE proficiency.
520
$a
Dissertation findings suggest AE language training should focus on AE and not on CE, as is current practice. Given phonological and other differences between AE and CE, enlisting all AE users to learn and adhere to AE phraseology will save time and money in training and alleviate miscommunication and confusion in flight, potentially saving lives.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Linguistics.
$3
557829
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0290
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
University of Oregon.
$b
Linguistics.
$3
1186838
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-09A(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10751612
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入