國立虎尾科技大學 |

Spitfire : = Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Spitfire :/
其他題名:	Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric.
作者:	DeShields, Inte'a A.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (301 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-10A(E).
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780438003095

Spitfire : = Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric.
DeShields, Inte'a A.

Spitfire :Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric. - 1 online resource (301 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

On March 26, 2014, for the first time in intercollegiate competitive debate history, two African American women won top honors and named champions of the Cross-Examination Debate Associations national tournament. Using this incident, this dissertation explores the press reports published about this historic moment. Through a collection of 19 artifacts, this dissertation demonstrates how American culture emboldens the white gaze to impose a culture of cultural oppression, and intellectual repression of Black thought while victimizing Western culture, toward the erasure of the celebration of Black women. This rhetorical analysis considers the 2014 Cross-Examination Debate Associations final tournament outcome to explore press reports as an exemplary case of how American cultural standardization edifies the white gaze and its rage in reaction to Black rhetoric.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780438003095Subjects--Topical Terms:

567738
Rhetoric.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Spitfire : = Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric.
LDR:03210ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 919358
005 20181127124955.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780438003095
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10811963
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umbc:11828
035 $a AAI10811963
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a DeShields, Inte'a A. $3 1193911
245 1 0 $a Spitfire : $b Framing White Rage in Response to Black Rhetoric.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (301 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-10(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Craig Saper.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Maryland, Baltimore County, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a On March 26, 2014, for the first time in intercollegiate competitive debate history, two African American women won top honors and named champions of the Cross-Examination Debate Associations national tournament. Using this incident, this dissertation explores the press reports published about this historic moment. Through a collection of 19 artifacts, this dissertation demonstrates how American culture emboldens the white gaze to impose a culture of cultural oppression, and intellectual repression of Black thought while victimizing Western culture, toward the erasure of the celebration of Black women. This rhetorical analysis considers the 2014 Cross-Examination Debate Associations final tournament outcome to explore press reports as an exemplary case of how American cultural standardization edifies the white gaze and its rage in reaction to Black rhetoric.
520 $a Pulling from Whiteness Studies, this dissertation presents a history of intercollegiate competitive debate alongside a history of the development of American culture to frame unmarked whiteness as problematic. Citing this historic moment, this project notes much of the media response to the tournament outcome presented critiques of the debater's arguments and speech style and focused on the male debaters, toward the erasure the women who were the champions.
520 $a This project uses exnomination, abstract liberalism, American Africanism, and cooptation to frame the rhetoric of whiteness as rage and demonstrates how this rage acts as a violent terror tactic that passively and aggressively coopted the Debater's strategic use of the "n-word" to create symbolic dissention that elevates the Black male debaters while simultaneously silencing and erasing the Black women debaters. It is the goal of this project to demonstrate how whiteness operates in reporting of this historic moment, and to exonerate the women who, through the rhetorical violence of white rage, were virtually erased in the process.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 567738
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Maryland, Baltimore County. $b Language Literacy and Culture. $3 1180556
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-10A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10811963 $z click for full text (PQDT)