國立虎尾科技大學 |

Effective Teacher-Assigned Grades : = An Analysis of Three High School Grading Practices.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effective Teacher-Assigned Grades :/
其他題名:	An Analysis of Three High School Grading Practices.
作者:	Weed, Beth M.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (96 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
標題:	Education. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355971118

Effective Teacher-Assigned Grades : = An Analysis of Three High School Grading Practices.
Weed, Beth M.

Effective Teacher-Assigned Grades :An Analysis of Three High School Grading Practices. - 1 online resource (96 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.Ed.Lead.)--Union University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

High school teachers assign grades to students for completing classes. Student grades are calculated into a grade point average (GPA). Teachers determine grades using various grading practices. These grading practices fluctuate within a school and within a subject. This study examined the impact grading practices have on teacher-assigned grades. A rural Tennessee high school was selected that used three grading practices for Algebra II students. The grading practices studied were defined as open grading, common grading, and standards-based grading. Students enrolled in Algebra II for the fall semesters of 2014--2015, 2015--2016, and 2016--2017 corresponded to open grading, common grading, and standards-based grading respectively. During 2014--2015, three teachers taught Algebra II for a total of 168 students. During 2015--2016, four teachers taught Algebra II for a total of 103 students. During 2016--2017, three teachers taught Algebra II for a total of 171 students. A total of 442 students participated in the study. A correlations analysis of teacher-assigned grades and percent correct for each student on the state end-of-course exam presented a positive correlation of R = .494 with moderate strength and a p value of .000. A two-way chi-square test indicated a difference in teacher-assigned grades for students based on the grading practice. The distribution of grades determined standards-based grading had the most assigned A grades. Common grading dispersed almost as many A grades as F grades and the most F grades for all the three grading practices. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a statistical significance of p = .000, with alpha = .05. The Post Hoc Tukey test showed a p value of .000 between open grading and common grading; a p value of .000 between open grading and standards-based grading; and a p value of .82 between common grading and standards-based grading. These results suggested open grading was the preferred practice over common grading and standards-based grading when comparing student percent correct. Common grading and standards-based grading were equal, suggesting no statistical difference between the two practices when looking at student percent correct. If a student has common grading for three classes, the GPA would be different from another student who had standards-based grading, or a combination of the three grading practices, for the same three classes. These results provide evidence that school districts can provide training and guidance on best grading practices for teachers. As a result of teacher training, student GPAs would reflect equality among the student body, and the letter grade would represent a more accurate level of academic learning.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355971118Subjects--Topical Terms:

555912
Education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Effective Teacher-Assigned Grades : = An Analysis of Three High School Grading Practices.
LDR:03998ntm a2200349Ki 4500 001 919736
005 20181129120547.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355971118
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10784502
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uniontn:10008
035 $a AAI10784502
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Weed, Beth M. $3 1194370
245 1 0 $a Effective Teacher-Assigned Grades : $b An Analysis of Three High School Grading Practices.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (96 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Ann Singleton.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.Ed.Lead.)--Union University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a High school teachers assign grades to students for completing classes. Student grades are calculated into a grade point average (GPA). Teachers determine grades using various grading practices. These grading practices fluctuate within a school and within a subject. This study examined the impact grading practices have on teacher-assigned grades. A rural Tennessee high school was selected that used three grading practices for Algebra II students. The grading practices studied were defined as open grading, common grading, and standards-based grading. Students enrolled in Algebra II for the fall semesters of 2014--2015, 2015--2016, and 2016--2017 corresponded to open grading, common grading, and standards-based grading respectively. During 2014--2015, three teachers taught Algebra II for a total of 168 students. During 2015--2016, four teachers taught Algebra II for a total of 103 students. During 2016--2017, three teachers taught Algebra II for a total of 171 students. A total of 442 students participated in the study. A correlations analysis of teacher-assigned grades and percent correct for each student on the state end-of-course exam presented a positive correlation of R = .494 with moderate strength and a p value of .000. A two-way chi-square test indicated a difference in teacher-assigned grades for students based on the grading practice. The distribution of grades determined standards-based grading had the most assigned A grades. Common grading dispersed almost as many A grades as F grades and the most F grades for all the three grading practices. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a statistical significance of p = .000, with alpha = .05. The Post Hoc Tukey test showed a p value of .000 between open grading and common grading; a p value of .000 between open grading and standards-based grading; and a p value of .82 between common grading and standards-based grading. These results suggested open grading was the preferred practice over common grading and standards-based grading when comparing student percent correct. Common grading and standards-based grading were equal, suggesting no statistical difference between the two practices when looking at student percent correct. If a student has common grading for three classes, the GPA would be different from another student who had standards-based grading, or a combination of the three grading practices, for the same three classes. These results provide evidence that school districts can provide training and guidance on best grading practices for teachers. As a result of teacher training, student GPAs would reflect equality among the student body, and the letter grade would represent a more accurate level of academic learning.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Education. $3 555912
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 1179560
650 4 $a Educational leadership. $3 585508
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0533
690 $a 0449
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Union University. $b Education. $3 1188144
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10784502 $z click for full text (PQDT)