國立虎尾科技大學 |

Assessing Interpretations of Experienced Ease and Difficulty as Motivational Constructs.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Assessing Interpretations of Experienced Ease and Difficulty as Motivational Constructs./
作者:	Fisher, Oliver.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (72 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International57-03(E).
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)

Assessing Interpretations of Experienced Ease and Difficulty as Motivational Constructs.
Fisher, Oliver.

Assessing Interpretations of Experienced Ease and Difficulty as Motivational Constructs. - 1 online resource (72 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-03.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Southern California, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Are people motivated by ease and sapped by difficulty, or the reverse, does ease undermine motivation while difficulty bolsters it? Following identity-based motivation theory, whether ease or difficulty bolsters or undermines motivation depends on which lay theory of ease or difficulty is accessible in the moment. Experienced ease can imply that something is "possible for me" in part because the odds of success are high, or that something is "not worth my time" in part because the task is of low value. Experienced difficulty can imply that something is "important for me" the task is valued, or that something is "impossible for me" as odds of success are low for "me" or "us". We developed ease-as-possibility, ease-as-triviality, difficulty-as-importance, and difficulty-as-impossibility measures to assess individual differences in endorsement of these lay theories (N=963). We tested (N=200) convergent and discriminant validity with other measures of motivation: self-efficacy, locus of control, growth, grit, mental toughness, prevention and promotion regulatory focus, and construal level. We documented predictive validity by showing that performance on a cognitive reasoning task correlates with ease-as-possibility, ease-as-triviality, and difficulty-as-impossibility (N=183). Ease-as-possibility, ease-as-triviality, difficulty-as-importance, and difficulty-as-impossibility supplement other measures of motivation, yielding new insight into motivational processes. These measures can be used in addition to other tools, including priming and implicit assessment.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

Subjects--Topical Terms:

555103
Educational psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Assessing Interpretations of Experienced Ease and Difficulty as Motivational Constructs.
LDR:02757ntm a2200313Ki 4500 001 920502
005 20181203094030.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10801485
035 $a (MiAaPQ)US_Calif_361140
035 $a AAI10801485
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Fisher, Oliver. $3 1195323
245 1 0 $a Assessing Interpretations of Experienced Ease and Difficulty as Motivational Constructs.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (72 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 57-03.
500 $a Adviser: Daphna Oyserman.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Southern California, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Are people motivated by ease and sapped by difficulty, or the reverse, does ease undermine motivation while difficulty bolsters it? Following identity-based motivation theory, whether ease or difficulty bolsters or undermines motivation depends on which lay theory of ease or difficulty is accessible in the moment. Experienced ease can imply that something is "possible for me" in part because the odds of success are high, or that something is "not worth my time" in part because the task is of low value. Experienced difficulty can imply that something is "important for me" the task is valued, or that something is "impossible for me" as odds of success are low for "me" or "us". We developed ease-as-possibility, ease-as-triviality, difficulty-as-importance, and difficulty-as-impossibility measures to assess individual differences in endorsement of these lay theories (N=963). We tested (N=200) convergent and discriminant validity with other measures of motivation: self-efficacy, locus of control, growth, grit, mental toughness, prevention and promotion regulatory focus, and construal level. We documented predictive validity by showing that performance on a cognitive reasoning task correlates with ease-as-possibility, ease-as-triviality, and difficulty-as-impossibility (N=183). Ease-as-possibility, ease-as-triviality, difficulty-as-importance, and difficulty-as-impossibility supplement other measures of motivation, yielding new insight into motivational processes. These measures can be used in addition to other tools, including priming and implicit assessment.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Southern California. $3 1182588
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 57-03(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10801485 $z click for full text (PQDT)