國立虎尾科技大學 |

State governance structures and higher education performance : = An examination of structures and performance in 46 states.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	State governance structures and higher education performance :/
其他題名:	An examination of structures and performance in 46 states.
作者:	Gross, Dolores A.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (145 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-02, Section: A, page: 4080.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International67-02A.
標題:	Educational administration. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780542567353

State governance structures and higher education performance : = An examination of structures and performance in 46 states.
Gross, Dolores A.

State governance structures and higher education performance :An examination of structures and performance in 46 states. - 1 online resource (145 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-02, Section: A, page: 4080.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--New Mexico State University, 2005.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a significant difference in higher education performance between states operating under two common higher education governance structures in the United States: statewide consolidated board structures and statewide coordinating board structures, as categorized by McGuinness. These two higher education governance structures in 46 states were compared on state higher education performance indices in five areas---preparation, participation, affordability, completion, and benefits---and 18 indicator areas within the indices. State performance data were obtained from the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education study Measuring Up 2000, which examined 50 states using the five performance areas for analysis.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780542567353Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148465
Educational administration.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

State governance structures and higher education performance : = An examination of structures and performance in 46 states.
LDR:03785ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 920556
005 20181203094032.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2005 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780542567353
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3208669
035 $a AAI3208669
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Gross, Dolores A. $3 1195393
245 1 0 $a State governance structures and higher education performance : $b An examination of structures and performance in 46 states.
264 0 $c 2005
300 $a 1 online resource (145 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-02, Section: A, page: 4080.
500 $a Advisers: Dana Christman; Ramon Dominguez.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--New Mexico State University, 2005.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a significant difference in higher education performance between states operating under two common higher education governance structures in the United States: statewide consolidated board structures and statewide coordinating board structures, as categorized by McGuinness. These two higher education governance structures in 46 states were compared on state higher education performance indices in five areas---preparation, participation, affordability, completion, and benefits---and 18 indicator areas within the indices. State performance data were obtained from the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education study Measuring Up 2000, which examined 50 states using the five performance areas for analysis.
520 $a Two major research questions resulted in the development of 23 research hypotheses, hypotheses related to the overall statewide higher education performance indices and 18 related to specific statewide indicators of higher education performance.
520 $a Using inferential statistics, differences addressed in 20 of the hypotheses did not achieve statistical significance (p < .05). The study found significant differences between consolidated and coordinating board structures in increased income from education, need-based financial aid, and low student debt in the state indicators. The lack of differences between structures may indicate a number of areas worthy of further study: (a) There is difficulty in measuring state performance in such expansive categories, (b) the lack of differences may indicate that structure has little impact in wide areas of state performance, (c) geographic and socioeconomic differences between states and regions may play a role in performance differences, and (d) the lack of differences may even raise the potential that some unmeasured indicators or statistical outliers may be more relevant.
520 $a Ongoing efforts to improve higher education performance in the states and to ensure public accountability should contribute to the importance of continued study of state higher education governance structures, their roles in managing state systems, and higher education performance outcomes. Based on the significant findings of the study, further investigation of differences between state structures and performance with regard to need-based financial aid, student debt, and increased income levels in the states as a result of higher education is recommended.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Educational administration. $3 1148465
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 1148448
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0514
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a New Mexico State University. $3 845459
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 67-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3208669 $z click for full text (PQDT)