國立虎尾科技大學 |

College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion./
Author:	Cartwright, Rose.
Description:	1 online resource (117 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-03B.
Subject:	Educational psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798384452331

College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion.
Cartwright, Rose.

College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion. - 1 online resource (117 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

The representation and understanding of students with disabilities and their experiences in higher education-as in many of our social institutions-is gradually evolving, but there is much work to be done. An emergent body of large survey-based research, complemented by smaller ethnographic studies, has shed light on the trajectories, needs, and perspectives of this growing student population. Still, there have been relatively few empirical approaches to examining such students' specific evaluations and interpretations of everyday institutional and social interactions involving disability; even less research is well-grounded in compelling psychological data.This study explored how undergraduate students with documented, non-visible learning disabilities (LDs) reason about anti-discrimination legislation and interpersonal issues involving equity, inclusion, and access in the university setting. The research utilized theoretical approaches and empirical findings from the fields of social cognitive developmental psychology and disability studies as a conceptual foundation and employed both semi-structured and open-ended clinical interview methods to examine how undergraduates with LDs (a) evaluated the general acceptability of disability anti-discrimination legislation as well as hypothetical instances of disability-related interactions in the university setting; and (b) reasoned about their evaluations. In a second interview segment, participants were also asked semi-structured autobiographical questions about undesired disability-related interactions in the university setting, followed by questions about their evaluations of those experiences and their thoughts about institutional changes that might prevent future such occurrences. Interviews concluded with an open-ended question about participants' general reflections on their experiences as college students with LDs. Interviews were analyzed and interpreted via adapted coding schemes previously developed within the social domain theory empirical tradition.The study included a total of 33 participants (Mage = 21.03, SDage = 2.08; n = 27 cisgender women), all of whom were enrolled in undergraduate coursework at a large public university and who self-identified as having a formally documented LD. Results indicated that disability anti-discrimination legislation is consistently affirmed for moral reasons such as equality, equity, and welfare, while judgements and reasoning about nuanced interpersonal experiences (both hypothetical and autobiographical) involve the coordination of myriad priorities, including moral (i.e., justice, welfare, rights), social conventional (i.e., social functioning, authority), personal (i.e., autonomy, choice, personal prerogative), prudential (i.e., one's own safety, comfort, or health), and other (e.g., integration, disability identity) considerations. Ideas about institutional change and reflections on lived experience range from seeking compassion and respect in dyadic interactions to widescale systemic efforts focused on disability and mental health awareness as well as equitable, best practices in instruction and accommodation.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798384452331Subjects--Topical Terms:

555103
Educational psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

College studentsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion.
LDR:04705ntm a22004337 4500 001 1152763
005 20241213095554.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798384452331
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31294409
035 $a AAI31294409
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Cartwright, Rose. $3 1479847
245 1 0 $a College Students With Learning Disabilities and Their Judgments About Issues of Access, Equity, and Inclusion.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (117 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Turiel, Elliot.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The representation and understanding of students with disabilities and their experiences in higher education-as in many of our social institutions-is gradually evolving, but there is much work to be done. An emergent body of large survey-based research, complemented by smaller ethnographic studies, has shed light on the trajectories, needs, and perspectives of this growing student population. Still, there have been relatively few empirical approaches to examining such students' specific evaluations and interpretations of everyday institutional and social interactions involving disability; even less research is well-grounded in compelling psychological data.This study explored how undergraduate students with documented, non-visible learning disabilities (LDs) reason about anti-discrimination legislation and interpersonal issues involving equity, inclusion, and access in the university setting. The research utilized theoretical approaches and empirical findings from the fields of social cognitive developmental psychology and disability studies as a conceptual foundation and employed both semi-structured and open-ended clinical interview methods to examine how undergraduates with LDs (a) evaluated the general acceptability of disability anti-discrimination legislation as well as hypothetical instances of disability-related interactions in the university setting; and (b) reasoned about their evaluations. In a second interview segment, participants were also asked semi-structured autobiographical questions about undesired disability-related interactions in the university setting, followed by questions about their evaluations of those experiences and their thoughts about institutional changes that might prevent future such occurrences. Interviews concluded with an open-ended question about participants' general reflections on their experiences as college students with LDs. Interviews were analyzed and interpreted via adapted coding schemes previously developed within the social domain theory empirical tradition.The study included a total of 33 participants (Mage = 21.03, SDage = 2.08; n = 27 cisgender women), all of whom were enrolled in undergraduate coursework at a large public university and who self-identified as having a formally documented LD. Results indicated that disability anti-discrimination legislation is consistently affirmed for moral reasons such as equality, equity, and welfare, while judgements and reasoning about nuanced interpersonal experiences (both hypothetical and autobiographical) involve the coordination of myriad priorities, including moral (i.e., justice, welfare, rights), social conventional (i.e., social functioning, authority), personal (i.e., autonomy, choice, personal prerogative), prudential (i.e., one's own safety, comfort, or health), and other (e.g., integration, disability identity) considerations. Ideas about institutional change and reflections on lived experience range from seeking compassion and respect in dyadic interactions to widescale systemic efforts focused on disability and mental health awareness as well as equitable, best practices in instruction and accommodation.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Disability studies. $3 809395
650 4 $a Educational sociology. $3 555555
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
653 $a College students
653 $a Disability accommodations
653 $a Learning disabilities
653 $a Social reasoning
653 $a Social cognitive developmental psychology
653 $a Social domain theory
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0201
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0340
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $b Education. $3 1181744
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-03B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31294409 $z click for full text (PQDT)